{"id":1803,"date":"2006-02-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2021-02-13T18:23:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/financiallawinstitute.ugent.be\/index.php\/wps\/de-code-lippens-versus-de-code-buysse-van-degelijk-besturen-over-naleven-of-uitleggen-tot-afdwingen\/"},"modified":"2021-02-13T18:23:48","modified_gmt":"2021-02-13T18:23:48","slug":"de-code-lippens-versus-de-code-buysse-van-degelijk-besturen-over-naleven-of-uitleggen-tot-afdwingen","status":"publish","type":"wps","link":"https:\/\/financiallawinstitute.ugent.be\/index.php\/wps\/de-code-lippens-versus-de-code-buysse-van-degelijk-besturen-over-naleven-of-uitleggen-tot-afdwingen\/","title":{"rendered":"De Code Lippens versus de Code Buysse: van degelijk besturen over naleven of uitleggen tot afdwingen?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Corporate governance develops at the speed of light. Recently in Belgian two corporate governance codes were issued: one for stock exchange listed companies (Code Lippens, December 2004) and one for non-listed entities (Code Buysse, September 2005). This article assesses the similarities and differences of both codes and discusses the role of professional advisors.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false},"categories":[],"class_list":["post-1803","wps","type-wps","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/financiallawinstitute.ugent.be\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/wps\/1803","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/financiallawinstitute.ugent.be\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/wps"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/financiallawinstitute.ugent.be\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/wps"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/financiallawinstitute.ugent.be\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1803"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/financiallawinstitute.ugent.be\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1803"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}