{"id":3396,"date":"2022-11-28T14:26:07","date_gmt":"2022-11-28T14:26:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/financiallawinstitute.ugent.be\/?post_type=wps&#038;p=3396"},"modified":"2022-11-28T14:26:07","modified_gmt":"2022-11-28T14:26:07","slug":"shareholder-inspection-rights-in-belgium-unpopular-or-unnecessary","status":"publish","type":"wps","link":"https:\/\/financiallawinstitute.ugent.be\/index.php\/wps\/shareholder-inspection-rights-in-belgium-unpopular-or-unnecessary\/","title":{"rendered":"Shareholder inspection rights in Belgium: unpopular or unnecessary?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>In this Working Paper Hans De Wulf dicusses the rules and relatively rare case law on shareholder inspection rights, allowing minority shareholders to inspect corporate documents, often in preparation for a derivative claim. It argues courts should not demand that plaintiffs show the &#8220;discovery&#8221; pursued during the inspection procedure could potentially be useful for a subsequent claim. Rather, the procedure should be considered as a stand-alone check on directors at the disposal of minority sharheolders.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false},"categories":[],"class_list":["post-3396","wps","type-wps","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/financiallawinstitute.ugent.be\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/wps\/3396","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/financiallawinstitute.ugent.be\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/wps"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/financiallawinstitute.ugent.be\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/wps"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/financiallawinstitute.ugent.be\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3396"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/financiallawinstitute.ugent.be\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3396"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}